G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon RX 780 vs Radeon RX 5300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon RX 780 vs Radeon RX 5300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon RX 780

2024

Why buy it

✅87.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
286.8% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 59.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.

Radeon RX 5300

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 284.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Radeon RX 780 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 780 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 87.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (7,658 vs 7,606), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 780 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 3 GB of VRAM, the newer frame-generation stack, FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of FSR Frame Generation (2023), a 5nm process instead of 7nm, and 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 5300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $370 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 284.2% (59.0 vs 15.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX 5300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 780 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon RX 780 vs Radeon RX 5300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX 780

The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.

Radeon RX 5300

The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 780 scores 7,658 and the Radeon RX 5300 reaches 7,606 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 780 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon RX 780) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300). Boost clocks: 2335 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX 780	Radeon RX 5300
G3D Mark Score	7,658	7,606
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	3840+173%	1408
Compute (TFLOPS)	35.87 TFLOPS+674%	4.632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2335 MHz+42%	1645 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	240+173%	88
L2 Cache	4 MB+167%	1.5 MB
Frame Generation	FSR 3 + AFMF	FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 780 is on the newer stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF, while the Radeon RX 5300 stays on FSR Frame Generation.

Feature	Radeon RX 780	Radeon RX 5300
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 780 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300 carries 3 GB. Radeon RX 780 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon RX 780 and 96-bit on the Radeon RX 5300. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX 780	Radeon RX 5300
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+33%	3 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	System	168 GB/s
Bus Width	System	96-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+167%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX 780	Radeon RX 5300
DirectX	12 (12_2)	12.1
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300).

Feature	Radeon RX 780	Radeon RX 5300
Encoder	RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine	VCN 2.0
Decoder	VCN 4.0	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 780 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 5300's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The Radeon RX 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 780) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon RX 780	Radeon RX 5300
TDP	180W	100W-44%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	—	180mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	42.5	76.1+79%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon RX 780 came in at $499, while the Radeon RX 5300 launched at $129. On MSRP, Radeon RX 5300 was 74.1% cheaper ($370 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) vs 59.0 (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon RX 5300 offers 285.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 780 (2024 vs 2020).

Feature	Radeon RX 780	Radeon RX 5300
MSRP	$499	$129-74%
Performance per Dollar	15.3	59.0+286%
Codename	Navi 32	Navi 14
Release	September 11 2024	May 28 2020
Ranking	#131	#336

Search Radeon RX 780 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 5300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.