
Radeon Pro 580X

Radeon RX 780
Radeon Pro 580X vs Radeon RX 780 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro 580X vs Radeon RX 780 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro 580X vs Radeon RX 780: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌20.2% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Radeon RX 780
2024Why buy it
- ✅24.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 580X vs Radeon RX 780 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 580X
The Radeon Pro 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 18 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,540 points.

Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 580X scores 7,540 and the Radeon RX 780 reaches 7,658 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 580X is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 780 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 780). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 2335 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,540 | 7,658+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3840+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+549% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 2335 MHz+95% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 144 | 240+67% |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 768 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro 580X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 580X has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 780 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro 580X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 580X and System on the Radeon RX 780. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580X) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 580X draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 780's 180W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 580X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 350W (Radeon RX 780). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-17% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 50.3+18% | 42.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro 580X came in at $600, while the Radeon RX 780 launched at $499. On MSRP, Radeon RX 780 was 16.8% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 offers 21.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 780 (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $499-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 15.3+21% |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Navi 32 |
| Release | March 18 2019 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #339 | #131 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














