GeForce RTX 2050
Radeon Pro 580X
GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon Pro 580X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon Pro 580X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon Pro 580X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2050
2018Why buy it
- ✅17.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 309.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.4 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌43.3% higher power demand at 215W vs 150W.
Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 215W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2050 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌300% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 51.4 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon Pro 580X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2050
The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.
Radeon Pro 580X
The Radeon Pro 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 18 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,540 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 and the Radeon Pro 580X reaches 7,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 580X uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580X). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580X). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,714+2% | 7,540 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+28% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS+82% | 5.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+43% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+28% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB+418% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2050 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 580X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2050 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 580X carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro 580X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 2050 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 580X. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580X) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the Radeon Pro 580X's 150W — a 35.6% difference. The Radeon Pro 580X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 150W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 35.9 | 50.3+40% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2050 came in at $150, while the Radeon Pro 580X launched at $600. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 2050 was 75% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro 580X) — the GeForce RTX 2050 offers 307.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 580X (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-75% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.4+308% | 12.6 |
| Codename | TU104 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | March 18 2019 |
| Ranking | #94 | #339 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2050 and Radeon Pro 580X
