GeForce RTX 2050 vs GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 2050
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2050
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 120.3% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2050.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-120.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+120.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $289 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 14.3% better value per dollar than the GeForce RTX 2050.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+14.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($289) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2050 and GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 2050
The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 120.3%. The GeForce RTX 2050 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 28 (GeForce RTX 3060) with 368 Tensor cores vs 112.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,714 | 16,995+120% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944 | 3584+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+27% |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 1777 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 184+64% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB | 3.5 MB+21% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+64% | 28 |
| Tensor Cores | 368+229% | 112 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 221.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 360 GB/s+221% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 23.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 170W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-45% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 35.9 | 100.0+179% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2050 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 and now averages $289. The GeForce RTX 2050 costs 48.1% less ($139 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 14.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-54% | $329 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-48% | $289 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.4 | 58.8+14% |
| Codename | TU104 | GA106 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #94 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2050 and GeForce RTX 3060
