
Radeon Pro 580X

Radeon RX 6400
Radeon Pro 580X vs Radeon RX 6400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro 580X vs Radeon RX 6400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro 580X vs Radeon RX 6400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅55.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌277.4% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌183% higher power demand at 150W vs 53W.
Radeon RX 6400
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $441 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 286.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 53W instead of 150W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 580X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 580X vs Radeon RX 6400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro 580X
The Radeon Pro 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 18 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,540 points.

Radeon RX 6400
The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 580X scores 7,540 and the Radeon RX 6400 reaches 7,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 580X is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6400). Raw compute: 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 2321 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,540 | 7,728+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+200% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.53 TFLOPS+55% | 3.565 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 2321 MHz+93% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+200% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+125% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro 580X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 580X has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6400 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro 580X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 580X and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 6400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon Pro 580X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs None (Radeon RX 6400). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580X) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 3.0 (Limited) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 580X draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 6400's 53W — a 95.6% difference. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 172mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 53W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 172mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.3 | 145.8+190% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro 580X came in at $600, while the Radeon RX 6400 launched at $159. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6400 was 73.5% cheaper ($441 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (Radeon Pro 580X) vs 48.6 (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 6400 offers 285.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6400 (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 580X | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $159-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 48.6+286% |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Navi 24 |
| Release | March 18 2019 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #339 | #330 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














