
Radeon RX 780 vs Radeon RX 6500

Radeon RX 780
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 780 is positioned at rank 296 and the Radeon RX 6500 is on rank 118, so the Radeon RX 6500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 780
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 780 is significantly newer (2024 vs 0). The Radeon RX 780 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX 6500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 780 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6500.
| Insight | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | Legacy (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6500 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $721 for the Radeon RX 780, it costs 79% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 377.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+377.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($721) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 780 and Radeon RX 6500

Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.

Radeon RX 6500
The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 780 scores 7,658 and the Radeon RX 6500 reaches 7,610 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,658 | 7,610 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780) vs None (Radeon RX 6500). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500).
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine | None |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 780 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 6500's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 780) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 75W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 172mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 42.5 | 101.5+139% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 780 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $721, while the Radeon RX 6500 launched at $199 and now averages $150. The Radeon RX 6500 costs 79.2% less ($571 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.6 (Radeon RX 780) vs 50.7 (Radeon RX 6500) — the Radeon RX 6500 offers 378.3% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $199-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $721 | $150-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.6 | 50.7+378% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | — |
| Release | September 11 2024 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #131 | #335 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














