
Radeon RX 780

T1000
Radeon RX 780 vs T1000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 780 vs T1000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Radeon RX 780 vs T1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 780
2024Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌42.6% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 780 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 780 vs T1000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.

T1000
The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 780 scores 7,658 and the T1000 reaches 7,649 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 780 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the T1000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon RX 780) vs 896 (T1000). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000). Boost clocks: 2335 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,658 | 7,649 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+329% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.87 TFLOPS+1335% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2335 MHz+67% | 1395 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+329% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 896 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The T1000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon RX 780 and 128-bit on the T1000. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) vs 1 MB (T1000) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780) vs 12.1 (T1000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 780 draws 180W versus the T1000's 50W — a 113% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 780) vs 350W (T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 50W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.5 | 153.0+260% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX 780 came in at $499, while the T1000 launched at $350. On MSRP, T1000 was 29.9% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.3 (Radeon RX 780) vs 21.9 (T1000) — the T1000 offers 43.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 780 (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $350-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.3 | 21.9+43% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | TU117 |
| Release | September 11 2024 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #131 | #333 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














