
GeForce RTX 2050

Radeon RX 5300
GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon RX 5300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon RX 5300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon RX 5300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2050
2018Why buy it
- ✅76.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌16.3% HIGHER MSRP$150 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 51.4 vs 59.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌115% higher power demand at 215W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 14.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 51.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 215W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2050 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2050 vs Radeon RX 5300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2050
The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon RX 5300
The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 and the Radeon RX 5300 reaches 7,606 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2050 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,714+1% | 7,606 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944+109% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS+117% | 4.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+4% | 1645 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+109% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5300 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 2050 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 2050 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 5300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2050 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300 carries 3 GB. GeForce RTX 2050 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 168 GB/s (Radeon RX 5300) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon RX 5300. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce RTX 2050 and 96-bit on the Radeon RX 5300. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) — the GeForce RTX 2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 168 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 96-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+167% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the Radeon RX 5300's 100W — a 73% difference. The Radeon RX 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 180mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 100W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 180mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 35.9 | 76.1+112% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 2050 came in at $150, while the Radeon RX 5300 launched at $129. On MSRP, Radeon RX 5300 was 14% cheaper ($21 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 59.0 (Radeon RX 5300) — the Radeon RX 5300 offers 14.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 5300 (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | Radeon RX 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $129-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.4 | 59.0+15% |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | May 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #94 | #336 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














