CPU
GPU
Radeon RX 5300M
Popular choices:
Arc A370M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 5300M is positioned at rank 41 and the Arc A370M is on rank 211, so the Radeon RX 5300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5300M
Performance Per Dollar Arc A370M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A370M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5300M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5300M | Arc A370M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A370M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5300M and Arc A370M
Radeon RX 5300M
The Radeon RX 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1445 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,044 points.
Arc A370M
The Arc A370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1550 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,115 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5300M scores 5,044 and the Arc A370M reaches 5,115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Arc A370M uses Generation 12.7, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 1,024 (Arc A370M). Raw compute: 4.069 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 3.174 TFLOPS (Arc A370M). Boost clocks: 1445 MHz vs 1550 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | Arc A370M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,044 | 5,115+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+38% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.069 TFLOPS+28% | 3.174 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1445 MHz | 1550 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 88+38% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | Arc A370M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5300M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A370M has 4 GB. The Arc A370M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 112 GB/s (Arc A370M) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon RX 5300M. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 4 MB (Arc A370M) — the Arc A370M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | Arc A370M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s+50% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5300M draws 85W versus the Arc A370M's 35W — a 83.3% difference. The Arc A370M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 350W (Arc A370M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | Arc A370M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 35W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 59.3 | 146.1+146% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5300M and Arc A370M
