CPU
GPU
Radeon RX 5300M
Popular choices:
Tesla K8
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 5300M is positioned at rank 41 and the Tesla K8 is on rank 208, so the Radeon RX 5300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5300M
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K8
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5300M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 5300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla K8 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla K8 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5300M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5300M | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Tesla K8 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5300M and Tesla K8
Radeon RX 5300M
The Radeon RX 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1445 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,044 points.
Tesla K8
The Tesla K8 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 16 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 693 MHz to 811 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,111 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5300M scores 5,044 and the Tesla K8 reaches 5,111 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Tesla K8 uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 1,536 (Tesla K8). Raw compute: 4.069 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 2.491 TFLOPS (Tesla K8). Boost clocks: 1445 MHz vs 811 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,044 | 5,111+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 1536+9% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.069 TFLOPS+63% | 2.491 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1445 MHz+78% | 811 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 88 | 128+45% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5300M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K8 has 4 GB. The Tesla K8 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 0.5 MB (Tesla K8) — the Radeon RX 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5300M draws 85W versus the Tesla K8's 100W — a 16.2% difference. The Radeon RX 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 350W (Tesla K8). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-15% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 59.3+16% | 51.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5300M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | Tesla K8 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GK104 |
| Release | November 13 2019 | September 16 2014 |
| Ranking | #442 | #515 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5300M and Tesla K8
