GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon RX 5300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon RX 5300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon RX 5300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

2011

Why buy it

✅6.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌147.1% higher power demand at 210W vs 85W.

Radeon RX 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 85W instead of 210W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (5,200 vs 5,044), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 5300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 5300M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon RX 5300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 29 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,200 points. Launch price was $289.

Radeon RX 5300M

The Radeon RX 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1445 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,044 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 scores 5,200 and the Radeon RX 5300M reaches 5,044 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon RX 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 448 (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300M). Raw compute: 1.312 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 4.069 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Radeon RX 5300M
G3D Mark Score	5,200+3%	5,044
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	448	1408+214%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.312 TFLOPS	4.069 TFLOPS+210%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	56	88+57%
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1.5 MB+138%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5300M is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 5300M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Radeon RX 5300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5300M carries 3 GB. GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 156 GB/s (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 168 GB/s (Radeon RX 5300M) — a 7.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 5300M. Memory bus width is 320-bit on the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and 96-bit on the Radeon RX 5300M. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300M) — the Radeon RX 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Radeon RX 5300M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+33%	3 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	156 GB/s	168 GB/s+8%
Bus Width	320-bit+233%	96-bit
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	1.5 MB+138%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 draws 210W versus the Radeon RX 5300M's 85W — a 84.7% difference. The Radeon RX 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5300M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Radeon RX 5300M
TDP	210W	85W-60%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	76°C	—
Perf/Watt	24.8	59.3+139%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 5300M (2019 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448	Radeon RX 5300M
MSRP	$289	—
Codename	GF110	Navi 14
Release	November 29 2011	November 13 2019
Ranking	#571	#442

Search GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 5300M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.