CPU
GPU
Radeon RX 5300M
Popular choices:
FirePro S9000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 5300M is positioned at rank 41 and the FirePro S9000 is on rank 291, so the Radeon RX 5300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5300M
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S9000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5300M is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The Radeon RX 5300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro S9000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro S9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5300M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5300M | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro S9000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5300M and FirePro S9000
Radeon RX 5300M
The Radeon RX 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1445 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,044 points.
FirePro S9000
The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5300M scores 5,044 and the FirePro S9000 reaches 5,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the FirePro S9000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 1,792 (FirePro S9000). Raw compute: 4.069 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (FirePro S9000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,044 | 5,059 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 1792+27% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.069 TFLOPS+26% | 3.226 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 88 | 112+27% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+100% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5300M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S9000 has 4 GB. The FirePro S9000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro S9000) — the Radeon RX 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+100% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5300M draws 85W versus the FirePro S9000's 225W — a 90.3% difference. The Radeon RX 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 350W (FirePro S9000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W-62% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.3+164% | 22.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5300M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | FirePro S9000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $156 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Tahiti |
| Release | November 13 2019 | August 24 2012 |
| Ranking | #442 | #441 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5300M and FirePro S9000
