
Radeon RX 5300M vs Quadro T1000 (móvel)

Radeon RX 5300M
Popular choices:

Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 5300M is positioned at rank 41 and the Quadro T1000 (móvel) is on rank 139, so the Radeon RX 5300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5300M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5300M | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 5300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5300M and Quadro T1000 (móvel)

Radeon RX 5300M
The Radeon RX 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1445 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,044 points.

Quadro T1000 (móvel)
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5300M scores 5,044 and the Quadro T1000 (móvel) reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.069 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 2.235 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1445 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,044 | 5,000 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+83% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.069 TFLOPS+82% | 2.235 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1445 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 88+83% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5300M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 1 MB (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5300M draws 85W versus the Quadro T1000 (móvel)'s 50W — a 51.9% difference. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300M | Quadro T1000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 50W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 59.3 | 100.0+69% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















