
Radeon RX 550 vs FirePro V9800

Radeon RX 550
Popular choices:

FirePro V9800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V9800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 550 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The Radeon RX 550 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro V9800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro V9800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 550.
| Insight | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 550 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $250), it costs 86% less, resulting in a 600.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+600.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 550 and FirePro V9800

Radeon RX 550
The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.

FirePro V9800
The FirePro V9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,727 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 550 scores 2,674 and the FirePro V9800 reaches 2,727 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 550 is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro V9800 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon RX 550) vs 1,280 (FirePro V9800). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V9800).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,674 | 2,727+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1280+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS | 1.856 TFLOPS+53% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 320 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon RX 550) vs 11.2 (FirePro V9800). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0+7% | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550) vs None (FirePro V9800). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V9800).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 550 draws 50W versus the FirePro V9800's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 550) vs 350W (FirePro V9800). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 155mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 155mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5+194% | 18.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 550 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the FirePro V9800 launched at $3499 and now averages $250. The Radeon RX 550 costs 86% less ($215 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 76.4 (Radeon RX 550) vs 10.9 (FirePro V9800) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 600.9% better value. The Radeon RX 550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro V9800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-98% | $3499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-86% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 76.4+601% | 10.9 |
| Codename | Lexa | Cayman |
| Release | April 20 2017 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #617 | #656 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













