Radeon RX 550 vs MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon RX 550

50

2,674

+1.4%

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

100

2,637

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

124%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

112%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

112%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

102%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

101%

#16

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

99%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M.

Insight	Radeon RX 550	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 550 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 550 Benchmark Check

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 550 and MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

Radeon RX 550

The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.

MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M

The MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,637 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 550 scores 2,674 and the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M reaches 2,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 550 is built on GCN 4.0 while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon RX 550) vs 384 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	Radeon RX 550	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
G3D Mark Score	2,674+1%	2,637
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512+33%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.211 TFLOPS+27%	0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	64+100%
L1 Cache	128 KB	512 KB+300%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon RX 550	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 550 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 550 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon RX 550	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon RX 550) vs 11.0 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon RX 550	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
DirectX	12_0+9%	11.0
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550) vs PureVideo HD (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550) vs MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264 (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M).

Feature	Radeon RX 550	MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M
Encoder	VCE 3.4	PureVideo HD
Decoder	UVD 6.3	VP4
Codecs	H.264,H.265	MPEG-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 550 draws 50W versus the MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 550) vs 350W (MONSTER GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.