Radeon RX 550
VS
Radeon R9 M380

Radeon RX 550 vs Radeon R9 M380

AMD

Radeon RX 550

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M380

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M380

#369
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1184%
#371
1073%
#372
1070%
#376
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
973%
#377
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
967%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#381
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
96%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
95%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
95%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
94%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
94%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
94%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
93%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
92%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 550.

InsightRadeon RX 550Radeon R9 M380
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)
Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 550 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $300), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 732.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon RX 550Radeon R9 M380
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+732.8%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($35)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 550 and Radeon R9 M380

AMD

Radeon RX 550

The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon R9 M380

The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 550 scores 2,674 and the Radeon R9 M380 reaches 2,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 550 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon RX 550) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 550Radeon R9 M380
G3D Mark Score
2,674
2,752+3%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
768+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.211 TFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS+27%
Boost Clock
1183 MHz+18%
1000 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
48+50%
L1 Cache
128 KB
192 KB+50%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX 550Radeon R9 M380
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 550) vs 96 GB/s (Radeon R9 M380) — a 16.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 550. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon RX 550) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M380) — the Radeon RX 550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 550Radeon R9 M380
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s+17%
96 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon RX 550) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon RX 550Radeon R9 M380
DirectX
12_0
12 (12_0)
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M380).

FeatureRadeon RX 550Radeon R9 M380
Encoder
VCE 3.4
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 6.3
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 550 draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 550) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 155mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon RX 550Radeon R9 M380
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Length
155mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
53.5+46%
36.7
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 550 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Radeon RX 550 costs 88.3% less ($265 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 76.4 (Radeon RX 550) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 730.4% better value. The Radeon RX 550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon RX 550Radeon R9 M380
MSRP
$79-74%
$300
Avg Price (30d)
$35-88%
$300
Performance per Dollar
76.4+730%
9.2
Codename
Lexa
Strato
Release
April 20 2017
May 5 2015
Ranking
#617
#607