
Radeon RX 550 vs FirePro W4300

Radeon RX 550
Popular choices:

FirePro W4300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W4300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W4300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 550.
| Insight | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 550 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 550 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $50), it costs 30% less, resulting in a 40.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+40.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 550 and FirePro W4300

Radeon RX 550
The Radeon RX 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,674 points. Launch price was $79.

FirePro W4300
The FirePro W4300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,719 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 550 scores 2,674 and the FirePro W4300 reaches 2,719 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 550 is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro W4300 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon RX 550) vs 768 (FirePro W4300). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550) vs 1.428 TFLOPS (FirePro W4300).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,674 | 2,719+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 768+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS | 1.428 TFLOPS+18% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon RX 550) vs 256 KB (FirePro W4300) — the Radeon RX 550 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon RX 550) vs 12 (FirePro W4300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 550) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W4300). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 550) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro W4300).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 550 draws 50W versus the FirePro W4300's 50W — a 0% difference. The FirePro W4300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 550) vs 350W (FirePro W4300). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 155mm vs 171mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 155mm | 171mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 71°C |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5 | 54.4+2% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 550 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the FirePro W4300 launched at $379 and now averages $50. The Radeon RX 550 costs 30% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 76.4 (Radeon RX 550) vs 54.4 (FirePro W4300) — the Radeon RX 550 offers 40.4% better value. The Radeon RX 550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550 | FirePro W4300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-79% | $379 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-30% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 76.4+40% | 54.4 |
| Codename | Lexa | Bonaire |
| Release | April 20 2017 | December 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #617 | #590 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













