
Radeon RX 560 (móvel) vs Quadro P1000

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Quadro P1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is positioned at rank #86 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P1000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $80), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 60.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+60.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 560 (móvel) and Quadro P1000

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points. Launch price was $99.99.

Quadro P1000
The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) scores 4,500 and the Quadro P1000 reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro P1000 uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 640 (Quadro P1000). Raw compute: 2.462 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000). Boost clocks: 1275 MHz vs 1519 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 4,495 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+60% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.462 TFLOPS+58% | 1.555 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1275 MHz | 1519 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P1000 has 4 GB. The Quadro P1000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) draws 65W versus the Quadro P1000's 40W — a 47.6% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 350W (Quadro P1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 40W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 69.2 | 112.4+62% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Quadro P1000 launched at $0 and now averages $80. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) costs 37.5% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 90.0 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 56.2 (Quadro P1000) — the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers 60.1% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-38% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 90.0+60% | 56.2 |
| Codename | Baffin | GP107 |
| Release | January 5 2017 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #478 | #466 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















