Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
VS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Radeon RX 560 (móvel) vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

2017Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is positioned at rank #86 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

#25
Radeon RX 7600M XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $300
98%
#28
Radeon RX 6650M XT
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
94%
#76
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
239%
#78
217%
#79
216%
#83
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
196%
#84
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
195%
#86
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
100%
#92
Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
97%
#95
GeForce GT 555M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35
95%
#97
GeForce GTX 760M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
95%
#100
GeForce 945M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $98
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
100%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
95%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
94%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
93%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
93%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
92%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
91%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
90%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
90%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
89%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
88%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
88%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 351.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 560 (móvel).

InsightRadeon RX 560 (móvel)GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-351.4%)
Leading raw performance (+351.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $280 for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, it costs 82% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 24.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon RX 560 (móvel)GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+24.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 560 (móvel) and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points. Launch price was $99.99.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) scores 4,500 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 351.4%. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 2.462 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1275 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 560 (móvel)GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
4,500
20,312+351%
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Ampere
Process Node
14 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
1024
4864+375%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.462 TFLOPS
16.2 TFLOPS+558%
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
1665 MHz+31%
ROPs
16
80+400%
TMUs
64
152+138%
L1 Cache
0.25 MB
4.8 MB+1820%
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX 560 (móvel)GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 560 (móvel)GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
8 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
448 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) draws 65W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 101.9% difference. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.

FeatureRadeon RX 560 (móvel)GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP
65W-68%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-42%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
69.2
101.6+47%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) costs 82.1% less ($230 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 90.0 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers 24.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon RX 560 (móvel)GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP
$99-75%
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$50-82%
$280
Performance per Dollar
90.0+24%
72.5
Codename
Baffin
GA104
Release
January 5 2017
December 1 2020
Ranking
#478
#73