
Radeon RX 560 (móvel) vs Radeon Pro 465

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 465
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is positioned at rank 86 and the Radeon Pro 465 is on rank 152, so the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 465
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 560 (móvel).
| Insight | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $150), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 197.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+197.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 560 (móvel) and Radeon Pro 465

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points. Launch price was $99.99.

Radeon Pro 465
The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) scores 4,500 and the Radeon Pro 465 reaches 4,538 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro 465 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465). Raw compute: 2.462 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465). Boost clocks: 1275 MHz vs 907 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 4,538 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.462 TFLOPS+33% | 1.858 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1275 MHz+41% | 907 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) draws 65W versus the Radeon Pro 465's 35W — a 60% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 465). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 35W-46% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 69.2 | 129.7+87% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 90.0 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 30.3 (Radeon Pro 465) — the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers 197% better value. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-80% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-67% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 90.0+197% | 30.3 |
| Codename | Baffin | Baffin |
| Release | January 5 2017 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #478 | #547 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















