
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

Tesla K40c
Radeon RX 560 (móvel) vs Tesla K40c Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 560 (móvel) vs Tesla K40c FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Radeon RX 560 (móvel) vs Tesla K40c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,600 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 7685.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Tesla K40c is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 245W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Tesla K40c
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌7676.8% HIGHER MSRP$7,699 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($7,699 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌276.9% higher power demand at 245W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 560 (móvel) vs Tesla K40c Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points. Launch price was $99.99.

Tesla K40c
The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) scores 4,500 and the Tesla K40c reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla K40c uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40c). Raw compute: 2.462 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c). Boost clocks: 1275 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,500 | 4,495 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2880+181% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.462 TFLOPS | 5.046 TFLOPS+105% |
| Boost Clock | 1275 MHz+46% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 64 | 240+275% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+7% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Tesla K40c does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) and 64-bit on the Tesla K40c. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) — the Tesla K40c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) draws 65W versus the Tesla K40c's 245W — a 116.1% difference. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 350W (Tesla K40c). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-73% | 245W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 69.2+278% | 18.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) came in at $99, while the Tesla K40c launched at $7699. On MSRP, Radeon RX 560 (móvel) was 98.7% cheaper ($7600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.5 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 0.6 (Tesla K40c) — the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers 7483.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 560 (móvel) (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 (móvel) | Tesla K40c |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-99% | $7699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.5+7483% | 0.6 |
| Codename | Baffin | GK180 |
| Release | January 5 2017 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #478 | #465 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















