Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 Nano

2015

Why buy it

✅59.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
555.6% HIGHER MSRP
$649 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌169.2% higher power demand at 175W vs 65W.

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Delivers 540.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Radeon R9 Nano is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 65W instead of 175W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Nano across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 Nano is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 59.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (4,609 vs 4,500), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon R9 Nano has no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 560 (móvel) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $550 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 540.1% (45.5 vs 7.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 Nano still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon RX 560 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 Nano

The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points. Launch price was $99.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 Nano scores 4,609 and the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Nano is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Raw compute: 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 2.462 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1275 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R9 Nano	Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	4,609+2%	4,500
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4096+300%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.192 TFLOPS+233%	2.462 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1000 MHz	1275 MHz+28%
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	256+300%	64
L1 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R9 Nano does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon R9 Nano	Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Nano and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560 (móvel). L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the Radeon R9 Nano has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 Nano	Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	HBM	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	4096-bit+1500%	256-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 Nano draws 175W versus the Radeon RX 560 (móvel)'s 65W — a 91.7% difference. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R9 Nano	Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
TDP	175W	65W-63%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	1x 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	152mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	26.3	69.2+163%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 Nano came in at $649, while the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon RX 560 (móvel) was 84.7% cheaper ($550 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.1 (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 45.5 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers 540.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 560 (móvel) (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon R9 Nano	Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
MSRP	$649	$99-85%
Performance per Dollar	7.1	45.5+541%
Codename	Fiji	Baffin
Release	August 27 2015	January 5 2017
Ranking	#306	#478

Search Radeon R9 Nano on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 560 (móvel) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.