Radeon R9 Nano vs RTXA5000-24Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 Nano vs RTXA5000-24Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 Nano vs RTXA5000-24Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 Nano

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,072 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
✅Delivers 450.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $3,721 MSRP).
✅Draws 175W instead of 230W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RTXA5000-24Q

2021

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
473.3% HIGHER MSRP
$3,721 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($3,721 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
❌31.4% higher power demand at 230W vs 175W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTXA5000-24Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.2% in PassMark G3D (4,803 vs 4,609), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTXA5000-24Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 Nano makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,072 cheaper on MSRP at $649 vs $3,721, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 450.2% (7.1 vs 1.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 Nano is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTXA5000-24Q has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R9 Nano vs RTXA5000-24Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 Nano

The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.

RTXA5000-24Q

The RTXA5000-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,803 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 Nano scores 4,609 and the RTXA5000-24Q reaches 4,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Nano is built on GCN 3.0 while the RTXA5000-24Q uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 8,192 (RTXA5000-24Q). Raw compute: 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTXA5000-24Q). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1695 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R9 Nano	RTXA5000-24Q
G3D Mark Score	4,609	4,803+4%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	4096	8192+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.192 TFLOPS	27.77 TFLOPS+239%
Boost Clock	1000 MHz	1695 MHz+70%
ROPs	64	96+50%
TMUs	256	256
L1 Cache	1 MB	8 MB+700%
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTXA5000-24Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 Nano leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Radeon R9 Nano	RTXA5000-24Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Nano and 64-bit on the RTXA5000-24Q. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 6 MB (RTXA5000-24Q) — the RTXA5000-24Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 Nano	RTXA5000-24Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	HBM	GDDR5
Bus Width	4096-bit+6300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 Nano draws 175W versus the RTXA5000-24Q's 230W — a 27.2% difference. The Radeon R9 Nano is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 350W (RTXA5000-24Q). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R9 Nano	RTXA5000-24Q
TDP	175W-24%	230W
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	1x 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	152mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	26.3+26%	20.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 Nano came in at $649, while the RTXA5000-24Q launched at $3721. On MSRP, Radeon R9 Nano was 82.6% cheaper ($3072 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.1 (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 1.3 (RTXA5000-24Q) — the Radeon R9 Nano offers 446.2% better value. The newer card here is RTXA5000-24Q (2021 vs 2015).

Feature	Radeon R9 Nano	RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP	$649-83%	$3721
Performance per Dollar	7.1+446%	1.3
Codename	Fiji	GA102
Release	August 27 2015	April 12 2021
Ranking	#306	#53

Search Radeon R9 Nano on Amazon

Search RTXA5000-24Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.