
Radeon R9 Nano
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Nano lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 Nano.
| Insight | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $55 versus $200 for the Radeon R9 Nano, it costs 73% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 278.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+278.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($55) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 Nano and Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

Radeon R9 Nano
The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1275 MHz to 1202 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 Nano scores 4,609 and the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) reaches 4,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Nano is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Raw compute: 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1202 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,609 | 4,800+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+300% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.192 TFLOPS+214% | 2.611 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1202 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 256+300% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — a 357.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 Nano. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon R9 Nano has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+357% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+3100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 Nano draws 175W versus the Radeon RX 560X (móvel)'s 65W — a 91.7% difference. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 350W (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 65W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 152mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.3 | 73.8+181% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) launched at $55 and now averages $55. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) costs 72.5% less ($145 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.0 (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 87.3 (Radeon RX 560X (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 560X (móvel) offers 279.6% better value. The Radeon RX 560X (móvel) is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon RX 560X (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $55-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $55-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.0 | 87.3+280% |
| Codename | Fiji | Polaris 21 |
| Release | August 27 2015 | April 11 2018 |
| Ranking | #306 | #483 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















