Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon Sky 500
Radeon R9 Nano
Popular choices:
Radeon Sky 500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Sky 500
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Sky 500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 Nano.
| Insight | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 Nano offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 Nano holds the technical lead. Priced at $200 (vs $500), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 144% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+144%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 Nano and Radeon Sky 500
Radeon R9 Nano
The Radeon R9 Nano is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,609 points. Launch price was $649.
Radeon Sky 500
The Radeon Sky 500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 Nano scores 4,609 and the Radeon Sky 500 reaches 4,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Nano is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon Sky 500 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 1,280 (Radeon Sky 500). Raw compute: 8.192 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (Radeon Sky 500).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,609 | 4,723+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+220% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.192 TFLOPS+237% | 2.432 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+220% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+223% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Sky 500) — the Radeon R9 Nano has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+6300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 Nano draws 175W versus the Radeon Sky 500's 150W — a 15.4% difference. The Radeon Sky 500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 350W (Radeon Sky 500). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 150W-14% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 152mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 26.3 | 31.5+20% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 Nano launched at $649 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon Sky 500 launched at $500 and now averages $500. The Radeon R9 Nano costs 60% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.0 (Radeon R9 Nano) vs 9.4 (Radeon Sky 500) — the Radeon R9 Nano offers 144.7% better value. The Radeon R9 Nano is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $500-23% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-60% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.0+145% | 9.4 |
| Codename | Fiji | Pitcairn |
| Release | August 27 2015 | March 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #306 | #455 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 Nano and Radeon Sky 500
