Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
VS
Tesla K20c

Radeon RX 560 (móvel) vs Tesla K20c

AMD

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

2017Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K20c

2012Core: 706 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is positioned at rank 86 and the Tesla K20c is on rank 325, so the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

#25
Radeon RX 7600M XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $300
98%
#28
Radeon RX 6650M XT
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
94%
#76
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
239%
#78
217%
#79
216%
#83
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
196%
#84
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
195%
#86
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
100%
#92
Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
97%
#95
GeForce GT 555M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $35
95%
#97
GeForce GTX 760M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
95%
#100
GeForce 945M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $98
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla K20c

#310
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
10628%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
100%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
99%
#327
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
99%
#328
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
99%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
94%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
93%
#332
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
92%
#334
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
91%
#335
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
91%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
91%
#337
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
90%
#338
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
89%
#339
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
88%
#340
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K20c.

InsightRadeon RX 560 (móvel)Tesla K20c
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $500), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 915.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon RX 560 (móvel)Tesla K20c
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+915.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 560 (móvel) and Tesla K20c

AMD

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points. Launch price was $99.99.

NVIDIA

Tesla K20c

The Tesla K20c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) scores 4,500 and the Tesla K20c reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla K20c uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20c). Raw compute: 2.462 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20c).

FeatureRadeon RX 560 (móvel)Tesla K20c
G3D Mark Score
4,500+2%
4,432
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
2496+144%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.462 TFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS+43%
ROPs
16
40+150%
TMUs
64
208+225%
L1 Cache
256 KB+23%
208 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1.25 MB+25%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX 560 (móvel)Tesla K20c
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20c) — the Tesla K20c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 560 (móvel)Tesla K20c
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1.25 MB+25%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) draws 65W versus the Tesla K20c's 225W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 350W (Tesla K20c). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon RX 560 (móvel)Tesla K20c
TDP
65W-71%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
69.2+251%
19.7
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Tesla K20c launched at $3199 and now averages $500. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) costs 90% less ($450 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 90.0 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 8.9 (Tesla K20c) — the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers 911.2% better value. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon RX 560 (móvel)Tesla K20c
MSRP
$99-97%
$3199
Avg Price (30d)
$50-90%
$500
Performance per Dollar
90.0+911%
8.9
Codename
Baffin
GK110
Release
January 5 2017
November 12 2012
Ranking
#478
#549