Radeon RX 560 (móvel) vs Tesla K20m

AMD

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

2017Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K20m

2013Core: 706 MHz
Similar parts
·

Radeon RX 560 (móvel) vs Tesla K20m Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon RX 560 (móvel) vs Tesla K20m: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $3,100 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 3180.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.5 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Tesla K20m is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Tesla K20m

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 3131.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,199 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (4,500 vs 4,432), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while Tesla K20m is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 560 (móvel) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,100 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $3,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3180.9% (45.5 vs 1.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon RX 560 (móvel) vs Tesla K20m Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points. Launch price was $99.99.

NVIDIA

Tesla K20m

The Tesla K20m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) scores 4,500 and the Tesla K20m reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is built on GCN 4.0 while the Tesla K20m uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20m). Raw compute: 2.462 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20m).

FeatureRadeon RX 560 (móvel)Tesla K20m
G3D Mark Score
4,500+2%
4,432
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
2496+144%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.462 TFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS+43%
ROPs
16
40+150%
TMUs
64
208+225%
L1 Cache
256 KB+23%
208 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1.25 MB+25%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Tesla K20m does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureRadeon RX 560 (móvel)Tesla K20m
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) and 64-bit on the Tesla K20m. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20m) — the Tesla K20m has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 560 (móvel)Tesla K20m
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1.25 MB+25%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) draws 65W versus the Tesla K20m's 225W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon RX 560 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 350W (Tesla K20m). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon RX 560 (móvel)Tesla K20m
TDP
65W-71%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
69.2+251%
19.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) came in at $99, while the Tesla K20m launched at $3199. On MSRP, Radeon RX 560 (móvel) was 96.9% cheaper ($3100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.5 (Radeon RX 560 (móvel)) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20m) — the Radeon RX 560 (móvel) offers 3150% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 560 (móvel) (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon RX 560 (móvel)Tesla K20m
MSRP
$99-97%
$3199
Performance per Dollar
45.5+3150%
1.4
Codename
Baffin
GK110
Release
January 5 2017
January 5 2013
Ranking
#478
#470

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.