Radeon RX 560 vs Quadro K2200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2200

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

99%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

98%

#77

Radeon Pro VII

MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400

97%

#78

Quadro RTX 5000

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

94%

#79

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692

93%

#80

Radeon Pro W6800X

MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799

90%

#154

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

2063%

#169

Quadro K2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

100%

#173

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

MSRP: $119|Avg: $86

98%

#175

Radeon Pro 560

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

97%

#176

Radeon Pro 460

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

97%

#180

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

MSRP: $139|Avg: $85

93%

#181

FirePro M5950

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

92%

#183

Radeon Pro WX 7130

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200

90%

#184

FirePro W7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $114

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 560 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K2200.

Insight	Radeon RX 560	Quadro K2200
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro K2200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K2200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $60), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 45.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon RX 560	Quadro K2200
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+45.8%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)	✅More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 560 Benchmark Check

Quadro K2200 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 560 and Quadro K2200

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

Quadro K2200

The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 560 scores 3,682 and the Quadro K2200 reaches 3,580 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro K2200 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560) vs 640 (Quadro K2200). Raw compute: 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200). Boost clocks: 1275 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX 560	Quadro K2200
G3D Mark Score	3,682+3%	3,580
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024+60%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.611 TFLOPS+81%	1.439 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1275 MHz+13%	1124 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L1 Cache	256 KB	320 KB+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon RX 560	Quadro K2200
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 560) vs 2 MB (Quadro K2200) — the Quadro K2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX 560	Quadro K2200
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX 560	Quadro K2200
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560) vs NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro K2200). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2200).

Feature	Radeon RX 560	Quadro K2200
Encoder	VCE 3.4	NVENC 4th Gen
Decoder	UVD 6.3	NVDEC 1
Codecs	HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 560 draws 75W versus the Quadro K2200's 68W — a 9.8% difference. The Quadro K2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 560) vs 350W (Quadro K2200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 203mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon RX 560	Quadro K2200
TDP	75W	68W-9%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	170mm	203mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70 C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	49.1	52.6+7%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 560 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Quadro K2200 launched at $500 and now averages $40. The Quadro K2200 costs 33.3% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.4 (Radeon RX 560) vs 89.5 (Quadro K2200) — the Quadro K2200 offers 45.8% better value. The Radeon RX 560 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).