Radeon RX 5700 vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Radeon RX 5700
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5700.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5700 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (270mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700 and GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5700 scores 14,296 and the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile reaches 14,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Raw compute: 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,296 | 14,332 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.949 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1755 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+80% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX 5700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — a 133.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700. Bus width: 256-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) vs 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+133% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700 draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile's 50W — a 113% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon RX 5700) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 270mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 50W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 270mm | 0mm |
| Height | 110mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 79.4 | 286.6+261% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | — |
| Codename | Navi 10 | AD107 |
| Release | July 7 2019 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #167 | #166 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5700 and GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
