
Radeon RX 580 vs Radeon R9 290X

Radeon RX 580
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 290X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 290X.
| Insight | Radeon RX 580 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (275mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 580 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 580 holds the technical lead. Priced at $59 (vs $60), it costs 2% less, resulting in a 6.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 580 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+6.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($59) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 580 and Radeon R9 290X

Radeon RX 580
The Radeon RX 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1257 MHz to 1340 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,799 points. Launch price was $229.

Radeon R9 290X
The Radeon R9 290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 24 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,426 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 580 scores 8,799 and the Radeon R9 290X reaches 8,426 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 580 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 290X uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 580) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X). Raw compute: 6.175 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580) vs 5.632 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X). Boost clocks: 1340 MHz vs 947 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,799+4% | 8,426 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2816+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.175 TFLOPS+10% | 5.632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1340 MHz+41% | 947 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 144 | 176+22% |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 704 KB+22% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 580 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 290X has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 580 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 580) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 290X) — a 25% advantage for the Radeon R9 290X. Bus width: 256-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 580) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290X) — the Radeon RX 580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 320 GB/s+25% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 512-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 580) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX 580) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X).
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 580 draws 185W versus the Radeon R9 290X's 350W — a 61.7% difference. The Radeon RX 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 580) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W-47% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 275mm |
| Height | — | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-21% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 47.6+98% | 24.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 580 launched at $229 MSRP and currently averages $59, while the Radeon R9 290X launched at $549 and now averages $60. The Radeon RX 580 costs 1.7% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 149.1 (Radeon RX 580) vs 140.4 (Radeon R9 290X) — the Radeon RX 580 offers 6.2% better value. The Radeon RX 580 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon RX 580 | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-58% | $549 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $59-2% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 149.1+6% | 140.4 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Hawaii |
| Release | April 18 2017 | October 24 2013 |
| Ranking | #301 | #342 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















