Radeon RX 6300 vs GeForce GTX 1060
Radeon RX 6300
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 6300 is positioned at rank #14 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6300 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2016). The Radeon RX 6300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 89.2% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6300.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-89.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+89.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $60 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 26.1% better value per dollar than the Radeon RX 6300.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+26.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300 and GeForce GTX 1060
Radeon RX 6300
The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6300 scores 5,319 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 89.2%. The Radeon RX 6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,319 | 10,064+89% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2560+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.686 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+141% |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+38% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 160+233% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 960 KB+275% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6300 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 32-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 192 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 32-bit | 192-bit+500% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC (Pascal).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6300 draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 134.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 6300) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-81% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-25% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 173mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 152.0+172% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The Radeon RX 6300 costs 33.3% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 133.0 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 26.1% better value. The Radeon RX 6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-76% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-33% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 133.0 | 167.7+26% |
| Codename | Navi 24 | GP104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #379 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6300 and GeForce GTX 1060
