
Radeon RX 6300 vs Radeon 760M

Radeon RX 6300
Popular choices:

Radeon 760M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 6300 is positioned at rank 14 and the Radeon 760M is on rank 294, so the Radeon RX 6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 760M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6300.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6300 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 760M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300 and Radeon 760M

Radeon RX 6300
The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6300 scores 5,319 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2599 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon RX 6300) vs 8 (Radeon 760M).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,319 | 5,449+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.686 TFLOPS | 5.323 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2599 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 12+50% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 760M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 32-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 32-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 (12_2) |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 4.0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6300 draws 35W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 80% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 6300) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 15W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 152.0 | 363.3+139% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | — |
| Codename | Navi 24 | Phoenix |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #379 | #421 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















