Radeon RX 6300
VS
Radeon 760M

Radeon RX 6300 vs Radeon 760M

AMD

Radeon RX 6300

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 760M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2599 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 6300 is positioned at rank 14 and the Radeon 760M is on rank 294, so the Radeon RX 6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300

#6
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
122%
#8
111%
#9
111%
#13
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
101%
#14
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
100%
#18
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 760M

#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
99%
#62
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350
96%
#284
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
697%
#286
632%
#287
630%
#291
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
573%
#292
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
569%
#294
Radeon 760M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#297
Radeon RX 780
MSRP: $499|Avg: $721
99%
#300
GeForce 940MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#301
GeForce MX130
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
97%
#302
Arc Graphics 130V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
97%
#303
Radeon R5 430
MSRP: $59|Avg: $50
96%
#304
GeForce MX150
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
96%
#307
GeForce MX450
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
96%
#308
Arc Graphics 140V
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
95%
#309
Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 760M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6300.

InsightRadeon RX 6300Radeon 760M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%)
Leading raw performance (+2.4%)
Longevity
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)
RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (4nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 760M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300 and Radeon 760M

AMD

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

AMD

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6300 scores 5,319 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2599 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon RX 6300) vs 8 (Radeon 760M).

FeatureRadeon RX 6300Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score
5,319
5,449+2%
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
6 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
768+50%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.686 TFLOPS
5.323 TFLOPS+44%
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2599 MHz+8%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
48+50%
32
L1 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores
12+50%
8

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 760M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon RX 6300Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 3 (Native)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 32-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 6300Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
64 GB/s
System
Bus Width
32-bit
System
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX 6300Radeon 760M
DirectX
12_2
12 (12_2)
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 4.0.

FeatureRadeon RX 6300Radeon 760M
Encoder
VCN 3.0
VCN 4.0
Decoder
VCN 3.0
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6300 draws 35W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 80% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 6300) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureRadeon RX 6300Radeon 760M
TDP
35W
15W-57%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
160mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
152.0
363.3+139%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).

FeatureRadeon RX 6300Radeon 760M
MSRP
$60
Avg Price (30d)
$40
Codename
Navi 24
Phoenix
Release
January 4 2022
January 31 2024
Ranking
#379
#421