
Radeon RX 6300 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

Radeon RX 6300
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 6300 is positioned at rank 14 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is on rank 15, so the Radeon RX 6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6300 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

Radeon RX 6300
The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,310 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6300 scores 5,319 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design reaches 5,310 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300) vs 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1417 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,319 | 5,310 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.686 TFLOPS+69% | 2.177 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+69% | 1417 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 288 KB+13% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 32-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 112 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 32-bit | 128-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC (3rd Gen).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6300 draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design's 75W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 6300) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-53% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 152.0+115% | 70.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | — |
| Codename | Navi 24 | GP107 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 3 2018 |
| Ranking | #379 | #429 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















