Radeon RX 6300
VS
Quadro P2000 Max-Q

Radeon RX 6300 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

AMD

Radeon RX 6300

2022Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

2017Core: 1215 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 6300 is positioned at rank 14 and the Quadro P2000 Max-Q is on rank 16, so the Radeon RX 6300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300

#6
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
122%
#8
111%
#9
111%
#13
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
101%
#14
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
100%
#18
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 Max-Q

#1
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
221%
#16
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#26
RTX A400
MSRP: $135|Avg: $135
66%
#29
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
59%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 6300 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 6300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6300.

InsightRadeon RX 6300Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Longevity
RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P2000 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300 and Quadro P2000 Max-Q

AMD

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6300 scores 5,319 and the Quadro P2000 Max-Q reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 6300Quadro P2000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
5,319
5,353
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
6 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768
768
Boost Clock
2400 MHz+63%
1468 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon RX 6300Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 3 (Native)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 32-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon RX 6300Quadro P2000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
32-bit
128-bit+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6300 draws 35W versus the Quadro P2000 Max-Q's 80W — a 78.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 6300) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon RX 6300Quadro P2000 Max-Q
TDP
35W-56%
80W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
152.0+127%
66.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon RX 6300Quadro P2000 Max-Q
MSRP
$60
Avg Price (30d)
$40
Codename
Navi 24
GP107GL
Release
January 4 2022
July 5 2017
Ranking
#379
#426