
Radeon RX 6300 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Radeon RX 6300
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 6300 is positioned at rank #14 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6300 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The Radeon RX 6300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6300.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300 and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Radeon RX 6300
The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6300 scores 5,319 and the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM reaches 5,474 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300) vs 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,319 | 5,474+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1344+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.686 TFLOPS+40% | 2.634 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+145% | 980 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 112+133% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+129% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM. Bus width: 32-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) — the Radeon RX 6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 192 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 32-bit | 256-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 1st Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6300 draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM's 170W — a 131.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 6300) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-79% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 241mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 152.0+372% | 32.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | — |
| Codename | Navi 24 | GK104 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | September 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #379 | #417 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















