
Radeon RX 640 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Radeon RX 640
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 640 is positioned at rank #323 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 640
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 640 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 640 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 640 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Radeon RX 640
The Radeon RX 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,172 points.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 640 scores 2,172 and the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) reaches 2,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 640 is built on GCN 4.0 while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) uses Gen. 12, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon RX 640) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 640 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,172 | 2,200+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+1900% | 32 |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | 1450 MHz+19% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 640 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 640 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 640 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) has 0 MB. The Radeon RX 640 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon RX 640 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 640) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon RX 640 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 640) vs Quick Sync Video (Xe) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs Quick Sync Video (Xe). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 640) vs AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)).
| Feature | Radeon RX 640 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | Quick Sync Video (Xe) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | Quick Sync Video (Xe) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 640 draws 50W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)'s 15W — a 107.7% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 640) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon RX 640 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 15W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 43.4 | 146.7+238% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 640 launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $55, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) costs 100+% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.5 (Radeon RX 640) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 640 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $55 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Rocket Lake Xe |
| Release | May 13 2019 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #665 | #809 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















