
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 640

Radeon Pro WX 3200
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 640
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is positioned at rank 131 and the Radeon RX 640 is on rank 323, so the Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 640
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 640.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 640 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $55 versus $199 for the Radeon Pro WX 3200, it costs 72% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 255.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+255.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199) | ✅More affordable ($55) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon RX 640

Radeon Pro WX 3200
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon RX 640
The Radeon RX 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,172 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 and the Radeon RX 640 reaches 2,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 640 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 640 (Radeon RX 640). Raw compute: 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 1.559 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 640).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,209+2% | 2,172 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.385 TFLOPS | 1.559 TFLOPS+13% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 640 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 640). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 640). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 640).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the Radeon RX 640's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon RX 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 350W (Radeon RX 640). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 50W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 34.0 | 43.4+28% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the Radeon RX 640 launched at $159 and now averages $55. The Radeon RX 640 costs 72.4% less ($144 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 39.5 (Radeon RX 640) — the Radeon RX 640 offers 255.9% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | Radeon RX 640 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $159-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199 | $55-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 39.5+256% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | July 2 2019 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #659 | #665 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















