Radeon Pro WX 3200
VS
Radeon RX 640

Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 640

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019Core: 1082 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 640

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is positioned at rank 131 and the Radeon RX 640 is on rank 323, so the Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3200

#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
98%
#67
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450
93%
#116
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1331%
#131
Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
100%
#132
Radeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
99%
#134
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
96%
#135
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
96%
#136
Quadro P3000
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
96%
#139
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $120
90%
#140
Radeon Pro V520
MSRP: $800|Avg: $300
90%
#141
Quadro M5500
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
89%
#142
Quadro K1200
MSRP: $300|Avg: $184
89%
#143
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
88%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
87%
#145
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
86%
#146
Radeon Sky 500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 640

#313
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
795%
#315
720%
#316
719%
#320
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
653%
#321
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
649%
#323
Radeon RX 640
MSRP: $159|Avg: $55
100%
#326
Iris Pro Graphics P580
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
99%
#327
Radeon E8870PCIe
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
99%
#330
Arc Graphics 140T
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
94%
#331
Radeon 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
94%
#333
GeForce 730A
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
93%
#334
GeForce GT 745A
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
91%
#335
GeForce 710A
MSRP: $35|Avg: $62
91%
#336
89%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 640.

InsightRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon RX 640
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Longevity
GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 640 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $55 versus $199 for the Radeon Pro WX 3200, it costs 72% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 255.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon RX 640
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+255.8%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199)
More affordable ($55)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon RX 640

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

AMD

Radeon RX 640

The Radeon RX 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,172 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 and the Radeon RX 640 reaches 2,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 640 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 640 (Radeon RX 640). Raw compute: 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 1.559 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 640).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon RX 640
G3D Mark Score
2,209+2%
2,172
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.385 TFLOPS
1.559 TFLOPS+13%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
160 KB
160 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 640 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon RX 640
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 3 (Native)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon RX 640
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 640). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon RX 640
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (FL 12_0)
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 640). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 640).

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon RX 640
Encoder
VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
UVD 6.3
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the Radeon RX 640's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon RX 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 350W (Radeon RX 640). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon RX 640
TDP
65W
50W-23%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
82°C
Perf/Watt
34.0
43.4+28%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the Radeon RX 640 launched at $159 and now averages $55. The Radeon RX 640 costs 72.4% less ($144 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 39.5 (Radeon RX 640) — the Radeon RX 640 offers 255.9% better value.

FeatureRadeon Pro WX 3200Radeon RX 640
MSRP
$199
$159-20%
Avg Price (30d)
$199
$55-72%
Performance per Dollar
11.1
39.5+256%
Codename
Polaris 23
Polaris 23
Release
July 2 2019
May 13 2019
Ranking
#659
#665