G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 640 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 640 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
25.2% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 13.7 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Radeon RX 640

2019

Why buy it

✅2.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.7 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Radeon Pro WX 3200 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon RX 640 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 640 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro WX 3200 instead at 2,209 vs 2,172, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 640 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon Pro WX 3200 has no comparable frame-generation support. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 640 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 23.1% (13.7 vs 11.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX 640 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon RX 640

The Radeon RX 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,172 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 and the Radeon RX 640 reaches 2,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 640 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 640 (Radeon RX 640). Raw compute: 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 1.559 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 640).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon RX 640
G3D Mark Score	2,209+2%	2,172
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.385 TFLOPS	1.559 TFLOPS+13%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	160 KB	160 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 640 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon RX 640
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 640.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon RX 640
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 640). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon RX 640
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (FL 12_0)
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 640). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 640).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon RX 640
Encoder	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	UVD 6.3	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the Radeon RX 640's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon RX 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 350W (Radeon RX 640). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon RX 640
TDP	65W	50W-23%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	82°C	—
Perf/Watt	34.0	43.4+28%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 came in at $199, while the Radeon RX 640 launched at $159. On MSRP, Radeon RX 640 was 20.1% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 13.7 (Radeon RX 640) — the Radeon RX 640 offers 23.4% better value.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon RX 640
MSRP	$199	$159-20%
Performance per Dollar	11.1	13.7+23%
Codename	Polaris 23	Polaris 23
Release	July 2 2019	May 13 2019
Ranking	#659	#665

Search Radeon Pro WX 3200 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 640 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.