
Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Radeon Pro WX 3200
Popular choices:

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is positioned at rank #131 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $199 for the Radeon Pro WX 3200, it costs 90% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 890.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+890.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3200 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Radeon Pro WX 3200
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 and the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs reaches 2,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs uses Gen. 12, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,209 | 2,200 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+1900% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has 0 MB. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs's 15W — a 125% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 15W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 34.0 | 146.7+331% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs launched at $0 and now averages $20. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs costs 89.9% less ($179 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 110.0 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs offers 891% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199 | $20-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 110.0+891% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | July 2 2019 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #659 | #744 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















