CPU
GPU
GRID M60-1B
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M60-1B is positioned at rank 357 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 is on rank 131, so the Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-1B
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M60-1B lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M60-1B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID M60-1B | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID M60-1B offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $199 for the Radeon Pro WX 3200, it costs 40% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 69.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M60-1B | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+69.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($120) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-1B and Radeon Pro WX 3200
GRID M60-1B
The GRID M60-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,256 points.
Radeon Pro WX 3200
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-1B scores 2,256 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 reaches 2,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-1B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-1B) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1B) vs 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200).
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,256+2% | 2,209 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+220% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+248% | 1.385 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+380% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M60-1B comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-1B) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the GRID M60-1B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M60-1B) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-1B draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 65W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-1B) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 65W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 10.0 | 34.0+240% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M60-1B launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199 and now averages $199. The GRID M60-1B costs 39.7% less ($79 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.8 (GRID M60-1B) vs 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the GRID M60-1B offers 69.4% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $199-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120-40% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.8+69% | 11.1 |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | July 2 2019 |
| Ranking | #525 | #659 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M60-1B and Radeon Pro WX 3200
