
GRID M60-1B

Radeon Pro WX 3200
GRID M60-1B vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID M60-1B vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID M60-1B vs Radeon Pro WX 3200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID M60-1B
2015Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1156.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.
Radeon Pro WX 3200
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,301 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1130.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅GRID M60-1B is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID M60-1B vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M60-1B
The GRID M60-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,256 points.

Radeon Pro WX 3200
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-1B scores 2,256 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200 reaches 2,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-1B is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-1B) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1B) vs 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200).
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,256+2% | 2,209 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+220% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+248% | 1.385 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+380% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M60-1B has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 3200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M60-1B and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 3200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-1B) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the GRID M60-1B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M60-1B) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-1B draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 65W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-1B) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 65W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 168mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 10.0 | 34.0+240% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID M60-1B came in at $2500, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 3200 was 92% cheaper ($2301 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.9 (GRID M60-1B) vs 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers 1133.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 3200 (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M60-1B | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $199-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.9 | 11.1+1133% |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | July 2 2019 |
| Ranking | #525 | #659 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














