G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R7 250X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R7 250X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅36.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Radeon R7 250X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 210mm, a 42mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
101% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 22.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon R7 250X

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 106.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.9 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 3200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
❌25% longer card at 210mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 250X instead at 2,269 vs 2,209, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 250X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 106.5% (22.9 vs 11.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 250X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro WX 3200 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R7 250X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon R7 250X

The Radeon R7 250X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 and the Radeon R7 250X reaches 2,269 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 250X uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 640 (Radeon R7 250X). Raw compute: 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250X).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon R7 250X
G3D Mark Score	2,209	2,269+3%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.385 TFLOPS+14%	1.216 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	160 KB	160 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon R7 250X
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250X carries 2 GB. Radeon Pro WX 3200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 250X) — the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon R7 250X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R7 250X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon R7 250X
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (FL 11_1)
Vulkan	1.1	1.2+9%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250X). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (Radeon R7 250X).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon R7 250X
Encoder	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)	VCE 1.0
Decoder	UVD 6.3	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the Radeon R7 250X's 80W — a 20.7% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 400W (Radeon R7 250X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 210mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon R7 250X
TDP	65W-19%	80W
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	210mm
Height	69mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	82°C	70°C-15%
Perf/Watt	34.0+20%	28.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 came in at $199, while the Radeon R7 250X launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R7 250X was 50.3% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 22.9 (Radeon R7 250X) — the Radeon R7 250X offers 106.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 3200 (2019 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	Radeon R7 250X
MSRP	$199	$99-50%
Performance per Dollar	11.1	22.9+106%
Codename	Polaris 23	Cape Verde
Release	July 2 2019	February 13 2014
Ranking	#659	#655

Search Radeon Pro WX 3200 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 250X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.