CPU
GPU
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Popular choices:
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is positioned at rank #131 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3200
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake).
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3200 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 32 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,200 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 and the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) reaches 2,200 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) uses Gen. 12, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 32 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,209 | 2,200 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Gen. 12 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+1900% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) has 0 MB. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs Quick Sync Video (Xe) (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs Quick Sync Video (Xe). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | Quick Sync Video (Xe) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | Quick Sync Video (Xe) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | AV1,H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,MJPEG,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)'s 15W — a 125% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 15W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | 75°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 34.0 | 146.7+331% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) launched at $0 and now averages $0. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) costs 100+% less ($199 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)) — the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Rocket Lake Xe |
| Release | July 2 2019 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #659 | #809 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 3200 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
