Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs RadeonT 660M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs RadeonT 660M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs RadeonT 660M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT 660M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌62.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 40W.

RadeonT 660M

2023

Why buy it

✅5.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 65W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RadeonT 660M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (2,221 vs 2,209), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RadeonT 660M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro WX 3200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RadeonT 660M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs RadeonT 660M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

RadeonT 660M

The RadeonT 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 and the RadeonT 660M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the RadeonT 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 384 (RadeonT 660M). Raw compute: 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (RadeonT 660M).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	RadeonT 660M
G3D Mark Score	2,209	2,221
Architecture	GCN 4.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.385 TFLOPS	1.459 TFLOPS+5%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32+33%	24
L1 Cache	160 KB+25%	128 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	RadeonT 660M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 660M carries 2 GB. Radeon Pro WX 3200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 64-bit on the RadeonT 660M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 660M) — the RadeonT 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	RadeonT 660M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 660M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	RadeonT 660M
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 660M). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 660M).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	RadeonT 660M
Encoder	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)	VCN 3.0
Decoder	UVD 6.3	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the RadeonT 660M's 40W — a 47.6% difference. The RadeonT 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 350W (RadeonT 660M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	RadeonT 660M
TDP	65W	40W-38%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	82°C	—
Perf/Watt	34.0	55.5+63%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RadeonT 660M (2023 vs 2019).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3200	RadeonT 660M
MSRP	$199	—
Codename	Polaris 23	Rembrandt+
Release	July 2 2019	January 3 2023
Ranking	#659	#565

Search Radeon Pro WX 3200 on Amazon

Search RadeonT 660M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.