CPU
GPU
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Popular choices:
RadeonT 660M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is positioned at rank 131 and the RadeonT 660M is on rank 226, so the Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3200
Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 660M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RadeonT 660M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RadeonT 660M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3200 and RadeonT 660M
Radeon Pro WX 3200
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.
RadeonT 660M
The RadeonT 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 scores 2,209 and the RadeonT 660M reaches 2,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is built on GCN 4.0 while the RadeonT 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 384 (RadeonT 660M). Raw compute: 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (RadeonT 660M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,209 | 2,221 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+67% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.385 TFLOPS | 1.459 TFLOPS+5% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 660M has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 660M) — the RadeonT 660M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 660M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 660M). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 660M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 3200 draws 65W versus the RadeonT 660M's 40W — a 47.6% difference. The RadeonT 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200) vs 350W (RadeonT 660M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 40W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 34.0 | 55.5+63% |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT 660M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | RadeonT 660M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199 | — |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Rembrandt+ |
| Release | July 2 2019 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #659 | #565 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 3200 and RadeonT 660M
