Quadro M600M vs Radeon RX 640

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M600M vs Radeon RX 640 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M600M vs Radeon RX 640: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M600M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 640 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Radeon RX 640

2019

Why buy it

✅22.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Quadro M600M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 640 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 640 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro M600M instead at 2,221 vs 2,172, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 640 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Quadro M600M is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 640 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro M600M vs Radeon RX 640 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M600M

The Quadro M600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,221 points.

Radeon RX 640

The Radeon RX 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,172 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M600M scores 2,221 and the Radeon RX 640 reaches 2,172 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M600M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon RX 640 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M600M) vs 640 (Radeon RX 640). Raw compute: 0.6728 TFLOPS (Quadro M600M) vs 1.559 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 640). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon RX 640
G3D Mark Score	2,221+2%	2,172
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6728 TFLOPS	1.559 TFLOPS+132%
Boost Clock	876 MHz	1218 MHz+39%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	16	40+150%
L1 Cache	128 KB	160 KB+25%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 640 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro M600M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon RX 640
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M600M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 640 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 640 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M600M and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 640. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M600M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 640) — the Quadro M600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon RX 640
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M600M) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 640). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon RX 640
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (FL 12_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro M600M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 640). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M600M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 640).

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon RX 640
Encoder	NVENC 4th Gen	VCE 3.4
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP5)	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M600M draws 30W versus the Radeon RX 640's 50W — a 50% difference. The Quadro M600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M600M) vs 350W (Radeon RX 640). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon RX 640
TDP	30W-40%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	74.0+71%	43.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 640 (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	Quadro M600M	Radeon RX 640
MSRP	—	$159
Codename	GM107	Polaris 23
Release	August 18 2015	May 13 2019
Ranking	#658	#665

Search Quadro M600M on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 640 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.