Radeon RX 6500 XT vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6500 XT
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The Radeon RX 6500 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 780 Ti.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6500 XT | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $42 versus $150 for the Radeon RX 6500 XT, it costs 72% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 252.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6500 XT | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+252.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($42) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6500 XT and GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Radeon RX 6500 XT
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2610 MHz to 2815 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 107W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,603 points. Launch price was $199.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6500 XT scores 9,603 and the GeForce GTX 780 Ti reaches 9,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Raw compute: 5.765 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Boost clocks: 2815 MHz vs 928 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,603+1% | 9,469 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2880+181% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.765 TFLOPS+8% | 5.345 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2815 MHz+203% | 928 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 240+275% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+7% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6500 XT comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB. The Radeon RX 6500 XT offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — a 133.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Ti. Bus width: 64-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 780 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 144 GB/s | 336 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 384-bit+500% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Decoder: VCN 3.0 (Limited) vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 (Limited) | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6500 XT draws 107W versus the GeForce GTX 780 Ti's 250W — a 80.1% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 172mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 83°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 107W-57% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-33% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 172mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-16% | 83°C |
| Perf/Watt | 89.7+137% | 37.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6500 XT launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti launched at $699 and now averages $42. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti costs 72% less ($108 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 64.0 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) vs 225.5 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers 252.3% better value. The Radeon RX 6500 XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6500 XT | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-72% | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $42-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.0 | 225.5+252% |
| Codename | Navi 24 | GK110B |
| Release | January 19 2022 | November 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #270 | #278 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6500 XT and GeForce GTX 780 Ti
