Radeon RX 6600M vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Radeon RX 6600M
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6600M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6600M is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The Radeon RX 6600M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 980 Ti.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6600M | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6600M and GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Radeon RX 6600M
The Radeon RX 6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,922 points.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6600M scores 13,922 and the GeForce GTX 980 Ti reaches 13,711 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 980 Ti uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Raw compute: 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Boost clocks: 2416 MHz vs 1075 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,922+2% | 13,711 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2816+57% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.659 TFLOPS+43% | 6.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2416 MHz+125% | 1075 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 112 | 176+57% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6600M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 980 Ti has 6 GB. The Radeon RX 6600M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 336 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_2) (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600M) vs NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6600M draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 980 Ti's 250W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-60% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 139.2+154% | 54.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6600M is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $649 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Codename | Navi 23 | GM200 |
| Release | May 31 2021 | June 2 2015 |
| Ranking | #173 | #179 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6600M and GeForce GTX 980 Ti
