Radeon RX 6600M vs Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon RX 6600M
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6600M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro W5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6600M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6600M | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro W5700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6600M and Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon RX 6600M
The Radeon RX 6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,922 points.
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6600M scores 13,922 and the Radeon Pro W5700 reaches 14,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 2416 MHz vs 1930 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,922 | 14,380+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2304+29% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.659 TFLOPS | 8.893 TFLOPS+3% |
| Boost Clock | 2416 MHz+25% | 1930 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 144+29% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W5700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_2) (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6600M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 68.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-51% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 139.2+99% | 70.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6600M is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $300 |
| Codename | Navi 23 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 31 2021 | November 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #173 | #163 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6600M and Radeon Pro W5700
