
Radeon RX 6600M vs Intel Arc Pro B60

Radeon RX 6600M
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6600M
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B60
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro B60.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6600M | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6600M and Intel Arc Pro B60

Radeon RX 6600M
The Radeon RX 6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,922 points.

Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 6600M scores 13,922 and the Intel Arc Pro B60 reaches 13,807 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Intel Arc Pro B60 uses Xe2, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60). Raw compute: 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60). Boost clocks: 2416 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 20 (Intel Arc Pro B60).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,922 | 13,807 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2560+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.659 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS+42% |
| Boost Clock | 2416 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112 | 160+43% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro B60 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_2) (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_2) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600M) vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600M) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6600M draws 100W versus the Intel Arc Pro B60's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 6600M) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-50% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 82 |
| Perf/Watt | 139.2+102% | 69.0 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6600M | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $450 |
| Codename | Navi 23 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | May 31 2021 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #173 | #175 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















