Radeon RX 780
VS
GeForce RTX 4070

Radeon RX 780 vs GeForce RTX 4070

AMD

Radeon RX 780

2024Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2335 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 780 is positioned at rank #296 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 780

#62
GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350
98%
#285
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
707%
#287
641%
#288
639%
#292
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
581%
#293
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
578%
#296
Radeon RX 780
MSRP: $499|Avg: $721
100%
#299
GeForce 940MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#300
GeForce MX130
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
98%
#301
Arc Graphics 130V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
98%
#302
Radeon R5 430
MSRP: $59|Avg: $50
98%
#303
GeForce MX150
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
98%
#306
GeForce MX450
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
97%
#307
Arc Graphics 140V
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
96%
#308
Radeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070

#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
112%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
111%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
111%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
110%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
109%
#43
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
108%
#44
GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
107%
#45
Radeon RX 7600 XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
107%
#46
GeForce RTX 2050
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
105%
#47
GeForce RTX 3080
MSRP: $699|Avg: $400
105%
#48
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $499|Avg: $449
103%
#49
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
MSRP: $549|Avg: $540
103%
#50
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
MSRP: $599|Avg: $600
102%
#51
Radeon RX 7800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $490
101%
#52
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $340
101%
#53
GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP: $599|Avg: $550
100%
#54
Radeon RX 7650 GRE
MSRP: $279|Avg: $380
99%
#55
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
MSRP: $470|Avg: $120
99%
#56
Arc A770
MSRP: $349|Avg: $280
97%
#57
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
MSRP: $289|Avg: $423
97%
#58
Arc A380
MSRP: $149|Avg: $119
95%
#59
Radeon RX 9070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
94%
#60
Radeon RX 7900 XT
MSRP: $899|Avg: $630
94%
#61
GeForce RTX 4080
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $800
84%
#62
Arc A310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
82%
#63
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
MSRP: $799|Avg: $800
81%
#64
Radeon RX 9070 XT
MSRP: $599|Avg: $700
79%
#65
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
MSRP: $749|Avg: $850
78%
#66
Radeon RX 6900 XT
MSRP: $999|Avg: $385
78%
#67
GeForce GTX 1630
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
75%
#68
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 251.5% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 780.

InsightRadeon RX 780GeForce RTX 4070
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-251.5%)
Leading raw performance (+251.5%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm)
🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm)
Ecosystem
✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (304mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 4070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $550 versus $721 for the Radeon RX 780, it costs 24% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 360.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon RX 780GeForce RTX 4070
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+360.8%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($721)
More affordable ($550)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 780 and GeForce RTX 4070

AMD

Radeon RX 780

The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 780 scores 7,658 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 251.5%. The Radeon RX 780 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon RX 780) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 2335 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (Radeon RX 780) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 184.

FeatureRadeon RX 780GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score
7,658
26,919+252%
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
5 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
3840
5888+53%
Compute (TFLOPS)
35.87 TFLOPS+23%
29.15 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2335 MHz
2475 MHz+6%
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
240+30%
184
L1 Cache
0.75 MB
5.8 MB+673%
L2 Cache
4 MB
36 MB+800%
Ray Tracing Cores
60+30%
46

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.

FeatureRadeon RX 780GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech
FSR 3 (Native)
DLSS 3.5
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
DLSS 3.0 (Native)
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 780 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 780GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
12 GB+200%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth
System
504 GB/s
Bus Width
System
192-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB
36 MB+800%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX 780GeForce RTX 4070
DirectX
12 (12_2)
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

FeatureRadeon RX 780GeForce RTX 4070
Encoder
RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder
VCN 4.0
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 780 draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon RX 780 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 780) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureRadeon RX 780GeForce RTX 4070
TDP
180W-10%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-46%
650W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
304mm
Height
137mm
Slots
0-100%
3
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
42.5
134.6+217%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 780 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $721, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The GeForce RTX 4070 costs 23.7% less ($171 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.6 (Radeon RX 780) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 361.3% better value. The Radeon RX 780 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).

FeatureRadeon RX 780GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP
$499-17%
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$721
$550-24%
Performance per Dollar
10.6
48.9+361%
Codename
Navi 32
AD104
Release
September 11 2024
April 12 2023
Ranking
#131
#32