
Radeon RX 780 vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q

Radeon RX 780
Popular choices:

Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 780 is positioned at rank 296 and the Quadro P4200 Max-Q is on rank 12, so the Quadro P4200 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 780
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 780 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2018). The Radeon RX 780 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 780.
| Insight | Radeon RX 780 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P4200 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 780 and Quadro P4200 Max-Q

Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.

Quadro P4200 Max-Q
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,800 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 780 scores 7,658 and the Quadro P4200 Max-Q reaches 7,800 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 780 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro P4200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon RX 780) vs 2,304 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780) vs 6.82 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 2335 MHz vs 1480 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,658 | 7,800+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+67% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.87 TFLOPS+426% | 6.82 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2335 MHz+58% | 1480 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+67% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 864 KB+13% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) vs 2 MB (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780) vs 12.1 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q).
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 780 draws 180W versus the Quadro P4200 Max-Q's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 780) vs 350W (Quadro P4200 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 100W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 42.5 | 78.0+84% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 780 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 780 | Quadro P4200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $721 | — |
| Codename | Navi 32 | GP104 |
| Release | September 11 2024 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #131 | #234 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














