
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is positioned at rank 208 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is on rank 76, so the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX Vega M GL
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GL.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

Radeon RX Vega M GL
The Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,906 points.

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1190 MHz to 1328 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,925 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 3,906 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q reaches 3,925 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Raw compute: 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 1.7 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1011 MHz vs 1328 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,906 | 3,925 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+100% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.588 TFLOPS+52% | 1.7 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | 1328 MHz+31% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+33% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega M GL comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 179.2 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 112.1 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) — a 59.9% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega M GL. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s+60% | 112.1 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 1024-bit+700% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC (3rd Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC (6th Gen) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | NVDEC (3rd Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega M GL draws 65W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q's 75W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-13% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 60.1+15% | 52.3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















